Purpose
This policy position statement outlines the global and local
environmental issues with respect to aviation, and sets out the
Institution's policy on aviation in the UK within this context.
CIWEM calls for:
• A Government review of the role of aviation as part of a
low carbon travel and transport strategy and low carbon economy for
the future.
• The Government to renegotiate Article 24 of the Chicago
Convention which exempts international air travel from fuel duty.
UK subsidies, taxes and duties need to be reassessed to make
aviation pay for its environmental costs, deter short haul aviation
and provide funds to reinvest into other transport
infrastructure.
• The UK Government to secure an international agreement on
measures to reduce aviation emissions on all greenhouse gases and
not just carbon dioxide.
• An end to misleading advertising of air fares that
encourage air travel, replaced with headline prices that reflect
the true cost to the consumer. Adverts for flights to be required
by law to mention prominently the resulting carbon emission.
• An end to new airport capacity in the UK with existing
capacity focussed where it is needed most (e.g. for long haul
flights and to connect isolated island communities).
• The Civil Aviation Authority and the Environment Agency
to be given a legal duty and the necessary powers to require those
in breach of air quality and noise limits to come back into
compliance.
• Whole-network integrated travel options to reduce car
travel to airports.
The Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management
(CIWEM) is the leading professional body for the people who plan,
protect and care for the environment and its resources, providing
educational opportunities, independent information to the public
and advice to government. Members in 98 countries include
scientists, engineers, ecologists and students.
Context
Aviation is a major UK industry, carrying over 235 million
passengers a year and over 2.3 million tonnes of
freighti. Travelling by air has brought many benefits to
people's lives and to the UK economy. It has removed some of the
limits of being an island nation by increasing our access to Europe
and the rest of the world and brought wider benefits from tourism
and business travel. Aviation accounts for a significant component
of our economy with 25% of our trade by value carried by air
freightii.
Whilst aviation is important for global commerce, CIWEM believes
there needs to be a wider debate in the UK about the role of
aviation in achieving a low carbon global economy and the equality
of opportunity it provides. In recent years air travel has become
cheaper, with the real environmental costs masked. One in five of
the world's international flights depart or land in the
UKiii. Yet air travel is mostly undertaken by the
wealthiest 20% of the population with people on low incomes rarely
flyingiv; therefore calls for aviation to pay for its
environmental costs are not necessarily regressive. A review of
aviation should consider the role of air travel in enabling
prosperity both in the UK and in other parts of the globe, where
people and businesses visit and trade, in tandem with equality of
opportunity.
Aviation policy in the UK
Aviation policy and regulation in the UK generally rests
with the Department of Transport and the Civil Aviation Authority
(CAA), however the EU has overall competence in many areas relating
to civil air transportv.
The previous Government's policy on aviation was set out in the
2003 White Paper "The Future of Air Transport" vi. This
concluded that air travel is essential to the UK's economy and
stated that more should be made of existing capacity. It also
supported the growth of regional airports to maintain regional
economic development, increase choice, and reduce the pressure on
the more over-crowded airports in the South East. The White Paper
set out the Government's conclusions on the future development of
airport capacity across the UK on a region-by-region and
case-by-case basis.
Shortly after the election of the Coalition Government in May
2010, it was announcedvii that planning powers will
be devolved to local government and community groups with the
abolition of Regional Government Offices, Regional Development
Agencies and the Infrastructure Planning Commission. These changes
will all impact on aviation through changes to the funding and
planning of airports. The Government has also specifically
announced that the third runway at Heathrow will be cancelled,
permission will be refused for additional runways at Gatwick and
Stansted, and taxation will be reformed from a per-passenger duty
(APD) to a per-plane duty (PPD). CIWEM believes that these are
important commitments that the Government will need to adhere
to.
Discussion of issues
Climate change
The Climate Change Act (2008) binds the UK to an 80% cut in
carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2050, with an interim
milestone of at least 26% by 2020. In January 2009 the Labour
Government set a target that in 2050 CO2 emissions from
UK aviation should not exceed 2005 levelsviii. The
Committee on Climate Change (CCC) was asked was asked to advise on
options for reducing emissions to meet this target and on its
implications for aviation expansion in the 2020s. The CCC concluded
that in order to reach climate change targets "deliberate policies
to limit demand below its unconstrained level are [...] essential"
ix.
UK domestic flights and international departures are one of the
fastest growing sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and are
currently responsible for around 6% of our total CO2
emissionsx. Other particulates and compounds that cause
radiative forcing1 such as nitrous
oxide and water vapour are also released by aircraft and have more
impact when they are released at altitude. When these are included
in estimates, the total radiative forcing from flights may be more
than double the contribution that CO2
makesxi.
The CCC predicts that with planned capacity constraints and
using a central case carbon price, (not including technological
progress), emissions would rise to around 74 MtCO2 in
2050. This is almost double the 2005 level of 37.5MtCO2
and does not incorporate non-CO2 emissions - which as
scientific understanding improves will need to be accounted
forxii. In order to reach the commitments in the Climate
Change Actxiii the Government has proposed that the UK
aviation target should be driven by the industry through fuel
efficiency and with the addition of international flights to the EU
ETS. CIWEM considers that policies to reduce air traffic movements
will also be needed to reduce GHG emissions.
Emissions Trading
The EU Directive (2008/101/EC)xiv to
include aviation within the EU Emissions Trading
System2 (ETS) came into force on 2
February 2009. From 2012 all flights departing from and arriving at
UK airports will be included in the EU ETS, and to comply with the
Directive, aircraft operators have been required to monitor
emissions from 1 January 2010xv.
CIWEM welcomes the change to the ETS to include all flights that
depart from or arrive to UK airports, but considers that allowances
need to reflect contraction and convergence principles for more
equitable mitigation . Whilst trading allowances is a fair and cost
effective mechanism for reducing emissions, in its current form the
EU ETS does not include other greenhouse gases and previous phases
of the scheme have been strict enough. The EU ETS may prove useful
to reduce carbon emissions as an interim measure provided there are
strong price signals and allowances are gradually decreased.
Emissions reductions from improved technology and fuel
efficiency
The aviation industryxvii claims that with
improved technology such as new aircraft engines and airframes,
more efficient air traffic management, the use of biofuels and
other measures, CO2 emissions can be reduced to 2000
levels by 2050 and still allow for passenger numbers to increase by
a factor of three. This is set out in an industry-sponsored
reportxviii which both WWF-UK and the Environment Agency
have heavily criticised for relying on unproven technologies and
insufficient incentives3. Manchester
Metropolitan University have examined possible solutions for a
'greener' aviation industry. Based on some 40 technical studies
they conclude that technology may provide the means to mitigate
some of air transport's environmental externalities but that human
behavioural change is also necessaryxix.
Carbon offsetting
Carbon offsetting is becoming increasingly popular and is
now offered by tour operators and airlines. Whilst offsetting the
carbon emitted from the flight by planting trees is a positive
action, it should be viewed as a short term solution whilst
behavioural change and technological advances begin to take effect.
Offsetting has been criticised for perpetuating a 'business as
usual' approach and allowing people to justify travelling by
air.
Air Capacity and demand
Taxation and pricing
The prices paid by customers do not currently reflect the
environmental costs of aviation due to subsidies, tax breaks and
the lack of a real economic value attached to the environmental
damage done by its emissions.
The Government needs to renegotiate Article 24 of the Chicago
Convention which exempts international air travel from fuel duty.
Adding VAT to fuel would help make aviation pay for its
environmental costs and provide significant funds to reinvest in
other transport infrastructure. One estimate suggests that
aviation's tax advantages amount to £9 billion per year of lost
revenue for the UK Treasuryxx. Air tickets and the
purchase of aircraft equipment are also currently exempt from
VAT.
Implementing an aviation fuel tax or charging for en-route
flight emissions are other policy measures that could reduce air
travel demand and increase revenue which the UK Government should
press for international agreement on.
The change to a per-place air duty (PPD) is welcomed by CIWEM as
this will ensure that air freight is accounted for within the tax
system and will provide more of an incentive to reduce the
environmental impacts of planes through more efficient planes and
fuller flights. We believe that PPD should be regularly reviewed
and raised.
The House of Commons Transport Committee stated that "UK
residents are taking the opportunity to travel by air increasingly
often, with demand stoked by falling fares" xxi.
Between 1997 and 2006 average airfares fell by around
50%xxii. Many flights are sold with misleading headline
prices which encourage people to take trips they might not normally
have considered. CIWEM believes that air fares should be advertised
with the final price that will be charged to the consumer alongside
the carbon emission associated with the flight (which would be
useful if personal carbon allowances became a reality). For example
an advert for a London - New York return flight to include that
3.72 tonnes of carbon dioxide is emitted per
passenger4.
There is significant competition between airlines and airports
in the UK and 'budget' airlines have taken a considerable market
sharexxiii. Although the sector is generally privately
owned the Government has provided £1.5bn since 1997 in the form of
repayable launch investmentsxxiv. In August 2009 the
Department of Business, Innovation and Skills provided £340 million
of support to Airbus. These investments and subsidies could have
been spent on other transport infrastructure.
Alternative transport
Improvements to rail services would reduce the need for
domestic aviation and bring economic benefits from tourism and
freight. CIWEM welcomes the commitment to establishing a high speed
rail network in Britain and believes this will encourage more
business travellers to use Eurotunnel links to Europe. The CCC have
calculated that there is scope to reduce business travel (by up to
30%) through the increased use of teleconferencing, though this may
need to be stimulated by price incentives.
Airport capacity
The previous Government supported the development of
regional airports to contribute to economic development and
employment. Regional airports handle over 40% of all UK air traffic
and are important for the transfer of post and other time-sensitive
goods such as newspapersxxv. Air connectivity is vital
for some businesses and communities in remote areas of the UK such
as the Scottish Highlands and Islandsxxvi. Regional
airports are largely served by low cost airlines and a number are
financially dependent on one or two operators which can change
their routes.
CIWEM believes that aviation capacity should be carefully planned
and managed to ensure that it is focused in those areas where there
is greatest need, alternatives are impractical and the local
environment is duly protected.
Local environmental
impacts
Many of the adverse impacts of aviation disproportionately
affect local populations. Air transport creates noise, light and
air pollution which impact on local biodiversity, heritage and
communities surrounding airports and those under flight
pathsxxvii.
As airports are often located near to major cities, their
expansion frequently results in the erosion of local greenspace and
greenbelts. If the proposed expansion of Bristol airport gains
approval it will encroach on the greenbelt, an Area of Outstanding
Natural Beauty and impact a SSSI containing species protected by
the Local Biodiversity Action Plan. Protected areas need to stay as
such.
Local roads become congested affecting the quality of life of
the local population and adding to air pollution. Following the
first three days of the closure of UK airspace in January 2010, air
pollution near Gatwick and Heathrow dropped significantly. Levels
of NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) and NOx (oxides of
nitrogen) fell to almost zero showing the impact of road traffic
resulting from travel to and from the airportsxxviii.
The Eddington Transport Studyxxix recommended greater
investment in surface access to airports such as rail links to
reduce the local impacts of travel. CIWEM considers adequate public
transport should service all airports and be considered and funded
as a part of airport expansion schemes.
The amended Civil Aviation Actxxx contains powers for
airports to control noise and local air quality caused by aircraft.
Penalties can be charged and the payments used for purposes to
benefit people who live in the area of the airport. This is to
encourage airlines to use quieter and less polluting aircraft and
should be utilised more. The CAA (for noise) and the Environment
Agency (for air quality) need to be given a legal duty and the
necessary powers to require those in breach of limits to come back
into compliance.
November 2010
Footnotes
1. Radiative forcing is a measure of the influence a factor has
in altering the balance of incoming and outgoing energy in the
Earth-atmosphere system and is an index of the importance of the
factor as a potential climate change mechanism. Radiative forcing
values are expressed in watts per square meter
(W/m2).
2. The EU ETS started in 2005 as a cap and trade scheme. It
works by capping total emissions to a fixed limit, with operators
required to surrender allowances to cover their total emissions. If
operators wish to increase their emissions from their share of the
overall aviation limit, they must buy additional allowances from
elsewhere within the ETS.
3. The SA report anticipates that 20% of total jet fuel uplift
would come from biofuels by 2030. The CCC have stated that "it is
not prudent to assume that biofuels in 2050 could account for more
than 10% of global aviation fuel" due to concerns about land
availability and sustainability. The CCC suggest that fleet fuel
efficiency improvements of 0.8% annually in the period to 2050 are
likely given technological trends and investment intentions.
4. Data from Atmosfair emissions calculator (http://www.atmosfair.de/en).
Emissions calculations are for the aircraft divided by the number
of passengers on board and also account for different pollutants
which are converted into a CO2 equivalent that
have a comparable warming effect.
References
i. DFT. 2010. Aviation. Available from: http://www.dft.gov.uk/aviation/
ii. HOUSE OF COMMONS TRANSPORT COMMITTEE. 2009. The
Future of aviation, December 2009. Available from: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmtran.htm
iii. CAIRNS, S., NEWSON, C. 2006. Predict and
Decide: Aviation, Climate Change and UK Policy. Environmental
Change Institute, University of Oxford.
iv. CAA Statistic.
v. HOUSE OF COMMONS TRANSPORT COMMITTEE. 2009. The Future
of aviation, December 2009.
vi. DFT. 2003. White Paper: The future of Air Transport.
Available from: http://www.dft.gov.uk
vii. CABINET OFFICE. 2010. Our programme for Government, May
2010.
viii. HC Deb 15th January 2009 c355 - 362. Available
from:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm090115/debtext/90115-0005.htm#column_355
ix. COMMITTEE ON CLIMATE CHANGE. 2009. Meeting the
UK aviation target - Options for reducing emissions to 2050.
Available from: http://www.theccc.org.uk/reports/aviation-report
x. BRITISH AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION. 2006. Fuel and
fuel efficiency.
xi. HC Deb 2nd May 2007 c1617W. Available
from:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070502/text/70502w0005.htm
and
CAIRNS, S., NEWSON, C. 2006. Predict and Decide: Aviation, Climate
Change and UK Policy. Environmental Change Institute, University of
Oxford.
xii. COMMITTEE ON CLIMATE CHANGE. 2009. Meeting the
UK aviation target - Options for reducing emissions to 2050.
Available from: http://www.theccc.org.uk/reports/aviation-report
xiii. Climate Change Act. 2008 Chapter 27. Available
from: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/ukpga_20080027_en_1
xiv. Directive 2008/101/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 amending
Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the
scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the
Community.
xv. EU. 2010. Environmental Policy Brief, July 2010.
Available from:
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/news/brief/2010_07/newsletter_07_2010.pdf
xvi. MEYER, A. GCI Briefing. Contraction and
Convergence.
xvii. SUSTAINABLE AVIATION. 2008. CO2 Roadmap.
Available from:
http://www.sustainableaviation.co.uk/images/stories/key%20documents/sa%20road%20map%20final%20dec%2008.pdf
xviii. SUSTAINABLE AVIATION. 2008. CO2
Roadmap. Available from:
http://www.sustainableaviation.co.uk/images/stories/key%20documents/sa%20road%20map%20final%20dec%2008.pdf
xix. HOUSE OF COMMONS TRANSPORT COMMITTEE.
2009. The Future of aviation, December 2009.
xx. CAIRNS, S., NEWSON, C. 2006. Predict and Decide:
Aviation, Climate Change and UK Policy. Environmental Change
Institute, University of Oxford.
xxi. HOUSE OF COMMONS TRANSPORT COMMITTEE. 2009. The
Future of aviation, December 2009.
xxii. COMMITTEE ON CLIMATE CHANGE. 2009. Meeting the
UK aviation target - Options for reducing emissions to 2050.
Available from: http://www.theccc.org.uk/reports/aviation-report
xxiii. CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY. 2006. No-frills
carriers: revolution or evolution, November 2006.
xxiv. HOUSE OF COMMONS TRANSPORT COMMITTEE. 2009.
The Future of aviation, December 2009.
xxv. CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY. 2007. Air services at
UK regional airports.
xxvi. HOUSE OF COMMONS TRANSPORT COMMITTEE. 2009.
The Future of aviation, December 2009.
xxvii. DFT. 2003. White Paper: The future of Air Transport.
Available from: http://www.dft.gov.uk
xxviii. BARRATT, B AND FULLER, G. 2010. Empty skies prove
that airports cause pollution. Environmental Research Group at
King's College, London.
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/empty-skies-proved-that-airports-cause-pollution-say-researchers-1950672.html
xxix. HM TREASURY & DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT. 2006.
The Eddington Transport Study: The case for action: Sir Rod
Eddington's advice to Government, December 2006.
xxx. Civil Aviation Act 2006 Chapter 4. Available
from: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2006/ukpga_20060034_en_1